Higgins Settlement Law
Since 1979
Contact
Name

Phone

Email

Message

Higgins Settlement Law Blog
CALL 888-316-4858
Settlement Law Blog
Print
July 06, 2010

Causing a heart attack as a physical injury

In Parkinson v Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2010-142 (June 28, 2010), the Tax Court excluded from income the compensation for a heart attack caused by the emotional distress of two co-employees of  medical center.  The Court distinguished a symptom of emotionaldistress, which is taxable, from objective signs of physical injury like a heart attack.  The heart attacks are distinguishable from symptoms such as insomnia, headaches, stomach disorders that are mentioned in the legislative history of section 104(a)(2) as being mere symptoms of emotional distress that are taxable.  The Court went much further than necessary on the distinction, however, by suggesting that phyiscal injuries resutling from emotinal distress are excludable under section 104(a)(2).  That view seems vulnerable if an appeal is filed by the Service.

Share on Twitter
May 17, 2010

Qualified Settlement Funds for California minors

Qualified Settlement Funds for California Minors

             California Probate Courts have jurisdiction to approve qualified settlement funds.  That is so because Probate Courts are not Courts of limited jurisdiction.  Rather, Probate Courts are part of the Superior Courts, which have unlimited jurisdiction.     

The more interesting question is whether the placement of settlement proceeds into a qualified settlement fund on behalf of a minor or incompetent is authorized by statute.  Probate Code section 3600 et seq.  do not include qualified settlement funds as an option in such cases.  We believe a legislative change is necessary to clarify that such authorization exists.  We have noted the same problem in New York.

Share on Twitter
May 17, 2010

Taxable Settlements and Over-Structuring

The Risk Of Over-Structuring In Taxable Settlements.

The alternative minimum tax on fees, costs and interest paid by a plaintiff in taxable settlements creates a risk of structuring too much of the settlement.  Plaintiffs in those situations may end up without sufficient money to pay tax.  Thus, pro forma tax returns should be run on every taxable settlement involving a structured settlement.

 Note that the alternative minimum tax does not apply to Civil Rights cases.  It will apply in all other taxable cases, including interest and punitive damages recovered in nontaxable cases.  Thus, care should be taken in every taxable case to compute the amount of tax to permit the plaintiff to make an informed decision about how to receive the settlement proceeds.  In appropriate cases, that tax can be somewhat mitigated by structuring the attorneys fee.

An example: a client receiving a $1,000,000.00 settlement with fees and costs of $550,000.00 has only $101,000.00 left for immediate cash.  Thus, there is probably no room for a structured settlement.  The calculations are as follows: 

Calculation of Net Available to Plaintiff
Settlement Amount $1,000,000.00
Federal Regular Tax ($134,808.00)
Net Federal Alternative Minimum Tax ($141,692.00)
California Regular Tax ($49,008.00)
California Minimum Tax ($23,492.00)
Fees and Costs ($550,000.00)
Net to Plaintiff $101,000.00

Notes about the federal  taxes above:  The plaintiff will pay the higher of the federal regular tax ($134,808.00) or the alternative minimum tax ($276,500.00).  In the above illustration, the AMT exceeds the regular tax by $124,192.00.  The federal miscellaneous itemized deduction for the attorney’s fees and costs of $550,000.00 gets reduced by 2% of adjusted gross income ($20,000.00) to $530,000.00.    The AMT has a $45,000.00 exemption amount, which phases out to zero for this taxpayer.   

Notes about the California taxes above.  The plaintiff will pay the higher of the California regular tax ($44,233.00) or the state minimum tax ($72,500.00).  In the above illustration, the minimum tax exceeds the regular tax by $28,267.00.  The California miscellaneous itemized deduction gets reduced by 6% of adjusted gross income ($40,711.11) to $489,289.00.

Share on Twitter
May 17, 2010

Set-Aside Trust submissions

Medicare set aside trusts

 As of this writing, set-aside trusts are required only in worker’s compensation cases.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has announced a new web portal for filing the electronic filing of applications for set-aside trusts in those cases.  The new web portal for electronic filing will be available in 2011.  In the meantime, submit applications to:

 CMS
c/o Coordination of Benefits Contractor
P.O. Box 33849
Detroit, MI 48232
Attention: WCMSA Proposal

 You can subscribe to the new web portal and receive emails each time the page is changed.  The web portal information page is at:

 http://www.cms.gov/WorkersCompAgencyServices/05_wcmsasubmission.asp#TopOfPage

Share on Twitter